Monday, 5 March 2007
Interesting story hitting the press today on the use of Australia’s notice-and-takedown provisions under the Copyright Regulations.
Volunteer-type hosting service Axxs.org had to take down this site (now on an overseas mirror), after getting a letter from the NSW Minerals Council, alleging infringement of their copyright in the material on this website. More detail on indymedia.
Apparently, despite the requirements under the Copyright Regulations to “insert sufficient information to enable the carriage service provider to identify the copyright material in respect of which the infringement is claimed”, the lawyer letter didn’t attempt to actually state what copyright existed in – telling the ISP to do the identification:
“Content in which our client owns copyright may be viewed on it’s website, http://www.nswmining.com.au. We ask that you compare our client’s website to the offending websites referred to above. On comparison, you will see the copyright infringement issues that our client has with the abovementioned websites.”
I’m troubled by this, and not just because I’m pretty sure it is NOT the intention of the regulations that lawyers who write these notices outsource the identification of copyright material to the host or ISP. (“Look at the website”??? please).
I’m concerned because this isn’t one of those cases that notice-and-takedown was meant to be provided for: cases, basically, where someone has put up shamelessly infringing material online with no apparent social benefit. The notice here is aimed at some speech which is pretty clearly political, something which at least arguably would be protected under fair dealing defences of criticism and review and/or parody/satire. This is not why the Safe Harbours were put in there, and arguably, it’s an abuse of the process.
Maybe we need an Australian version of Chilling Effects.org to track this kind of thing.
UPDATE: Rising Tide, the people behind the website, have issued a counter-notice. Their press release is here.
UPDATE 2: Pete Black has commented. Note also that if you’re a barrister looking for something to do with your time, RisingTide are looking for some pro bono assistance…
2 Responses to “Notice and takedown, Australian-style”
Leave a Reply
Do not post material that is defamatory or obscene, that infringes any third party's copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights, or that violates any other right of any other person.
We reserve the right to remove or edit any comment for any reason.
Note: Posting more than two links in a comment may cause it not to appear because it will be submitted for moderation. Also, links in comments will not be counted by Google, so spamming is pointless.
March 5th, 2007 at 12:18 pm
great write up kim.
as far as I know, chilling effects do look at non-US stuff. I’ll try to send them the text of this case, to see what happens.
were you aware that these regulations were amendments from the Australia-US Free Trade agreement?
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_reg/car200412004n405376/index.html
(check out the schedule)
March 5th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
I am one of the people responsible for the website in question. There is a good chance of proceedings being launched on this case very soon, and we are seeking a barrister to represent us on a pro-bono basis. We can cover disbursements.
If any barristers reading this are interested, please get in touch with us on risingtiderisingtide.org.au, or on (02) 4926 1641