Friday, 24 August 2007
If you haven’t already seen it mentioned in the news, there’s now a way to identify who is editing entries in Wikipedia–or at least the organisations from which the edits are being made.
WikiScanner, created by a Cal Tech computation and neural-systems graduate student, provides a searchable database that cross-references edits to Wikipedia pages with information on the owners of the IP addresses from which those edits originate.
So while Wikipedia usernames, adopted by anyone wishing to edit an article, may render the individual anonymous, they do not necessarily do the same for organisations that the anonymity offered by user names may not be so useful to conceal your identity–or at least that of your employer.
Using WikiScanner has revealed some interesting edits by organisations with a vested interest in particular articles–either adding positive material, or deleting criticism.
For example, someone at Diebold, the company that supplies voting machines in the United States, has deleted text indicating concerns of regarding the integrity of those machines, as well as information about the CEO’s fundraising activities for US President Bush. WikiScanner has also revealed that the staff of the Australian Prime Minister has edited articles that might be damaging to the Government (which is heading into an election). And the list goes on.
2 Responses to “So who’s making those Wikipedia edits?”
Leave a Reply
Do not post material that is defamatory or obscene, that infringes any third party's copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights, or that violates any other right of any other person.
We reserve the right to remove or edit any comment for any reason.
Note: Posting more than two links in a comment may cause it not to appear because it will be submitted for moderation. Also, links in comments will not be counted by Google, so spamming is pointless.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:17 pm
I have a different point of opinion at my blog Basically my sole point is noone should be allowed to make people information public. Now people will be scared in editing wikipedia and it kills the purpose of wkipedia.
August 26th, 2007 at 11:17 am
Nitin
I didn’t think that I’d expressed an opinion either way on this one as to whether WikiScanner is a good thing or not. As you point out in your blog post, it’s quite a complicated issue. While WikiScanner may have a chilling effect on some posts, I think it’s useful for people to realise that Wikipedia may not always be as “accurate” as they might have assumed.
Also, it’s my understanding that WikiScanner does *not* identify individuals–instead it identifies the IP address associated with an edit, which can then be matched with the organisation that owns that address. This distinction is important. It means that Wikipedia edits may still be anonymous, so long as they are not made from an IP address with an identifiable affiliation.