Wednesday, 30 August 2006
The New York Times has prevented access from the UK to an article detailing intelligence on recent terrorism concerns in the UK. The article in question, “Details Emerge in British Terror Case” (published 27 August), contained details that may have run afoul of the requirement under UK law that prohibits the pre-trial publication of “prejudicial information” about defendants. The New York Times used technology designed to deliver targeted advertising to users to prevent anyone using a computer located in the UK from downloading the article. The article quotes Jonathan Zittrain (of the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School and the Oxford Internet Institute) in saying that the paper’s action is consistent with trends on the Internet to restrict information.
It is thought to be the first time that the paper has withheld access to an article to avoid contravening laws in the UK.
One Response to “NY Times uses Web technology to uphold UK law on pre-trial confidentiality”
Leave a Reply
Do not post material that is defamatory or obscene, that infringes any third party's copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights, or that violates any other right of any other person.
We reserve the right to remove or edit any comment for any reason.
Note: Posting more than two links in a comment may cause it not to appear because it will be submitted for moderation. Also, links in comments will not be counted by Google, so spamming is pointless.
August 31st, 2006 at 6:41 pm
The issue for me seems to be that the NYT can claim it has done everything possible to avoid publishing the information in the UK, but since there are lots of websites openly quoting the article, and the text can simply be cut-n-pasted into an email and sent to the UK (or you can even use the NYT’s own send to a friend facility to do this), won’t the trial still potentially be prejudiced?