Tuesday, 6 September 2005
The decision in the Australian KaZaA case (Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd [2005] FCA 1242) has been published.
The New York Times has also published an article on the decision, and gives a useful history of KaZaA since its launch in 2001.
It is clear that this decision will have implications beyond Australia’s shores. For some detailed comments on the decision, see Kim’s post.
Leave a Reply
Do not post material that is defamatory or obscene, that infringes any third party's copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights, or that violates any other right of any other person.
We reserve the right to remove or edit any comment for any reason.
Note: Posting more than two links in a comment may cause it not to appear because it will be submitted for moderation. Also, links in comments will not be counted by Google, so spamming is pointless.